The economic freedom and screen quota

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24862/rcdu.v14i2.1689

Abstract

The article objective to analyze the mechanism of the economic obligation to exhibit brazilian cinematographic audiovisual works, as an instrument of prestige to national culture, apparently confrontation for economic freedom and free enterprise. The analysis will include an exposition of the provision of the constitutional text referred to in art. 170, which advocates the economy in the Democratic State, following the principles related to the economic branch with reflection on postal freedoms, the portrait of the adequacy even and even of the constitutional order of intervention, through the granting of constitutional freedom to intervention by the Federal Supreme Court on the subject of screen quota, operated by Provisional Measure nº. 2.228-1, of September 6, 2001, which established a period of twenty years, as of September 5, 2001, the reserve of an annual percentage of Brazilian cinematographic and videophonographic works among its titles, obliging to launch them commercially. As the realization of the guarantee of the full exercise of cultural rights and access to the sources of national culture, the promotion of state intervention touches the effective access to culture, even because it represents a transindividual aspect, insofar as everyone holds the Mas with individualizable legislation, but with individualizable authorization, the culture is experimentally distinct for each person and, that the measure comes from the same guarantee of recognition of the legislator's promise of prestige to a certain extent the national culture, coexisting the legal commandment with economic freedom and free enterprise . So is the present work that aims to seek the aesthetics of constitutionality, in order to provoke legislation on the issue of the subject, even more to find in a federal project of processing in the Legislative Power of similarity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Levi Hülse, Universidade Alto Vale do Rio do Peixe - Uniarp, Caçador-SC

Doutor e Mestre em Ciência Jurídica pela Universidade do Vale do Itajaí- UNIVALI - SC. Bacharel em Direito pela Fundação Universidade Regional de Blumenau FURB (2010) e graduado em História pela Fundação Universidade Regional de Blumenau FURB (2006). Advogado com a OAB/SC 31.986. Docente  e  pesquisador  dos  Programas  de  Pós-Graduação  em  Desenvolvimento  e  Sociedade  e  Profissional    em   Educação Básica    da    Universidade    Alto   Vale    do    Rio   do    Peixe – UNIARP. Editor da Revista Ponto de Vista Jurídico – UNIARP. E-mail: levi@uniarp.edu.br. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9974-6325. O autor agradece ao Fundação de Âmparo à Pesquisa e Inovação de Santa Catarina através do edital 15/2021, pelo apoio financeiro.

Adriana Pereira Benjamini

Especialista em Metodologia do Ensino da Língua Portuguesa, pela Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina (UNOESC). E-mail: adrianabenjamini@hotmail.com. Lattes iD: http://lattes.cnpq.br/3027468442452838

Mônica Aparecida Schramm Frarão

Bacharel em Direito, pela Faculdade Metropolitana de Blumenau (FAMBEBLU). Servidora do Instituto Federal Catarinense (IFC).  E-mail:
mass05@bol.com.br. Lattes iD: http://lattes.cnpq.br/1015942185272133.

Published

2023-10-19

How to Cite

Hülse, L., Benjamini, A. P., & Frarão, M. A. S. (2023). The economic freedom and screen quota. The UNIFOR Law Course Journal, 14(2), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.24862/rcdu.v14i2.1689

Issue

Section

Artigos